What is the nastiest thing you've ever eaten? I suppose some would list an insect of some sort. Maybe a fried caterpillar or a roasted locust. Or maybe some sort of testicular burger as is a delicacy somewhere in the world. But what does it mean when you say eat? Is that the same as ingestion? As in placement in the mouth, chomping with the pearly whites, softening with saliva before swallowing? Or is eating just the last part, the swallowing part? That's eating, right? I mean, that's the most important part that facilitates our survival. This suggests that the yellowish-brown, sticky phlegm that passes between your nose passage and the back of your throat when you are half-dead with a cold is actually being eaten. Myself, I'm amused at how eating that warm cocktail of disease doesn't just kill you. I guess that's pretty gross. But I can't really help it. That's what I think about when I'm trying to fall asleep at night.
I think about odd bits. Like how to avoid the rude, cold splash from the toilet when you're executing a #2 in the midst of the brutal Canadian winter. Nothing like an icy wake-me-up to break the monotony of winter blues, you say? Comes with the deal? Can't avoid it? Well, I say Nayyy! So I asked myself, the engineer, "There's got to be a better way!" After much thought, I have devised not 1, but 2 strategem to stop this winter demon in its track!
The first is not really all that elaborate and definitely has its drawbacks. Like high diving, you have a free-falling object hitting the water. And similarly, the smaller the splash, the better the 'dive'. Now Olympic divers control splash through immaculate body control. With what we have to do, control is lost beyond the final 'release' because what's hitting the water is not part of ourselves. But don't despair, our saviour is indifference! Yes, we don't care! Divers care, because THEY'RE hitting the water, and therefore dive into the DEEP end. For what we're trying to do, we couldn't give two sh**s! Which means that we can afford to dive off the shallow end, or go one better and take the water entirely out of the equation and go for the direct hit! As I've mentioned however, there are flaws to this technique. One, move too far forward at release and you may be in for a surprise meeting with year-old stains underneath the front edge of the toilet seat (may or may not apply to our female readership). Two, this one applies more if you're at a house party where your actions may be scrutinized as soon as you head for fresher air. This technique often leaves its mark in the form of the dreaded chocolate skid marks and may have long-term repercussions on your social life. Which brings us to my second form of splash free engagement.
Prior to assuming your position, take one square of toilet paper and place in vicinity of projected landing. Take two if you don't care for the environment much. Or even double the protection if it happens to be a much-anticipated deposit. This technique is generally fool-proof if efforts are renewed after every 'release'. It does away with the embarrassing skid marks and prevents splashbacks 90% of the time. So why bother with the first, Dave? Why not just employ strategy #2 at all times? Well, it is true that strategy #2 is superior under most circumstances, but cases where toilet paper is at a premium or where toilet overflows are perceived to be a palpable threat, strategy #1 or a combination thereof may be ideal. Next lesson: What to do if there is no toilet paper. It can be done.